Correlation between dating frequency academic success would indicate

Mahoney and colleagues looked at the effect of three different breakfast options—ready-to-eat cereal, instant oatmeal, or no breakfast—on the results of cognitive tests among elementary school children. One way that diet quality may influence academic performance is by ensuring adequate intake of certain nutrients. Among children aged 9 to 11, eating either the cereal or oatmeal breakfast enhanced cognitive performance compared with no breakfast, but the oatmeal had additional benefits compared with the ready-to-eat cereal. Which two nutrients mentioned in this course influence cognitive function in children?

However, the benefits from low-GI choices could be due to the slower and more sustained blood sugar response and fewer fluctuations in brain levels of glucose over a period of several hours.20 This physiologic response to low-GI foods could improve students’ ability to better concentrate during the several hours between breakfast and lunch, thus contributing to better academic performance.18,20 A few experimental studies have examined the impact of GI ratings of food choices on cognitive tests.

It also may create a cyclical pattern in future generations, particularly in areas of low socioeconomic status where other compounding issues are present (see figure).5 Cyclical Relationship Between Poor Nutrition and Educational Outcomes Because academic performance influences future health, it’s an important public health issue.

It’s also important to assess what nutrition factors most influence academic performance and how to improve them.

Boys and girls had enhanced spatial memory, and girls also had improved short-term memory when they ate oatmeal. Reduced likelihood of failing a literary assessment D. Diet quality has been assessed in relation to academic performance using which of the following methods? The frequency with which children eat certain junk foods B.

The same results were found when looking at children aged 6 to 8, and these younger children also showed better auditory attention.18 A similar study of adolescents aged 12 to 14 found improved response times on two cognitive tests, the Stroop and Flanker tasks, which evaluate cognitive processing speed, choice reaction time, and selective attention, with a low-GI breakfast compared with a high-GI or no breakfast.21 Other research has examined the impact of different GI choices on the results of cognitive testing at regular time intervals throughout the morning. Based on this course, which of the following statements is true regarding the body of research on sugar-sweetened beverages and academic performance? There’s no evidence to suggest that sugar-sweetened beverages affect academic performance. All available research supports an association between sugar-sweetened beverages and reduced academic performance due to the sugar content. All available research supports an association between sugar-sweetened beverages and reduced academic performance due to the caffeine content. Newer research suggests a link between sugar-sweetened beverages and reduced academic performance, but it’s unknown if this is a true causal association. To date, there’s only one study that has examined the relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and academic performance among elementary school students.

Leave a Reply